Legal Opinion
Smith v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided May 21, 1992No. 90-64PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge, filed the opinion of the Court, in which STEINBERG, Associate Judge, joined. HOLDAWAY, Associate Judge, concurring in the result, filed a separate opinion.
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
The appellant, Edward F. Smith, appeals from a September 14,1989, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision which denied him entitlement to retroactive pension benefits. Upon review of the record, the briefs, the arguments of the parties, and the amicus brief, the Court holds that: (1) the Veterans’ Administration (now the Department of Veterans Affairs) (VA), violated its duty under 38…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Vda de Landicho v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Hamilton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Cook v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Johnson v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Harvey v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.