Vda de Landicho v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
After having received separate memoranda in these cases from both parties on jurisdictional issues, the Court, by order dated August 31, 1993, consolidated these cases for determination of jurisdictional issues arising under the Court’s practice of routinely permitting substitution of parties upon the death of an appellant while the case is pending before the Court. Upon consideration of the pleadings and oral arguments of the parties, the Court holds that substitution is not permissible in cases such as those here on appeal where the appellant is a veteran who dies while the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Zevalkink v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Robinette v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Locher v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Smith v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Padgett v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.