Legal Opinion
Cook v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 16, 1994No. 91-1535PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Judge:
The appellant, veteran James R. Cook, has applied for attorney fees and court costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in connection with the representation of the appellant in this Court by Andrew H. Marshall, a non-attorney practitioner not supervised by an attorney, in Cook v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 231 (1993). In that case, the Court reversed the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) with regard to two claims. In response to the appellant’s application, the Secretary has filed a brief, arguing that, absent an express waiver of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Stillwell v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Locher v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Felton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
- Shaw v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Vidal v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.