Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 5, 1996No. 94-80PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEINBERG, Judge:

The appellant, Due Tu Johnson, widow of deceased veteran Elbert Johnson, appeals a September 29, 1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision finding that payments under the Minimum Income Widow provision of the Survivor Benefit Plan, an annuity from the Department of the Navy, are countable income for improved death-pension purposes. The parties filed briefs, and, in response to a September 22, 1995, Court order, the Secretary filed a supplemental memorandum; the appellant did not file a response to that pleading. For the reasons that follow, the Court will…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  5. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Green v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  2. Charles L. Breedlove Brenda Breedlove v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
  3. Pamela J. Sharp v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009
  4. Buie v. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
  5. Thomas M. Nielson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API