Legal Opinion

People v. Sacks

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided March 14, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles Solomon, M.

This is a prosecution for Sabbath

breaking (Penal Law, art. 192). Specifically, the defendant is charged with the violation of section 2143 of the Penal Law, which reads: “ Labor prohibited on Sunday. All labor on Sunday is prohibited, excepting the works of necessity and charity. In works of necessity or charity is included whatever is needful during the day for the good order, health or comfort of the community.”

The pertinent issue, under the unusual circumstances of this case, is the proper connotation to be given the term “ labor ” within the meaning of the statute.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wakefield v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. People v. . DunfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Russell Flour & Feed Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PestronkNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1956
  2. People v. KahlNassau County District Court · 1965
  3. People v. AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. FinkelsteinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
  5. People v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API