People v. Abrahams
New York Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceFuchsberg, J.
Defendant, an employee of the Poughkeepsie Plaza Pharmacy, was charged with selling a ceramic coin bank for $1.03 on Sunday in violation of the provisions of section 9 of the General Business Law. He challenges his conviction on the grounds that this "Sabbath Law” (General Business Law, § 2) is violative of equal protection principles contained in both the State and Federal Constitutions (NY Const, art I, § 11; US Const, 14th Arndt) and, as presently written, is void for vagueness.1
Less than a year ago, we were asked to decide this same equal protection question. While three of us were…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In re the Adoption of Malpica-OrsiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.