Legal Opinion

People v. Pestronk

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided November 19, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles Solomon, M.

Neither side in the instant prosecution, notwithstanding diligent research, has been able to find a single reported case in this State directly in point on the precise issue here involved. A cause which presents a new question for the first time, and for which, consequently, there is no precedent applicable in all respects, is said to be a case of first impression. (Bouvier’s Law Dictionary [Rawle’s 3d rev.], p. 1515; People v. Pinnock, 207 Misc. 1097.) This case seems to fall in the aforesaid category.

Defense counsel ask the court to note here that underwater activity, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Todd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. . PhyfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People v. ShakunNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. People v. BencNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Sherwin v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kass v. SchneidermanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1960
  2. People v. FelicianoNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1958
  3. People v. Buffington, New York County Courts1969
  4. In re Cesar P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. IssacharNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API