People v. . Dunford
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered ¡November 8, 1911, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of ¡New York convicting the defendant of a violation of section 2147 of the Penal Law. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.
The defendant was convicted in the Court of Special -Sessions of having violated section 2147 of the Penal Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 40) and the conviction has been affirmed by the Appellate Division, in the second department. The defendant now appeals to this court and claims that he was not shown to have violated the statute. Section 2147 prohibits “ public traffic on Sunday ” and the specific act, with which the defendant was charged, was that he “ offered certain real estate property for sale ” to the complainant, a detective sergeant, on -Sunday, December 18th, 1910. According to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lindenmuller v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Neuendorff v. . DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- People v. KuppratNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Hess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.