Legal Opinion

Stamey v. Rutherfordton Electric Membership Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1958No. 249PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff alleged, separately, two causes of action. Her first cause of action is for personal injuries suffered by her intestate from his injury on February 22, 1956, until his death on February 26, 1956; and her second cause of action is for her intestate’s wrongful death. Hinson v. Dawson, 241 N.C. 714, 86 S.E. 2d 585; Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 226 N.C. 332, 38 S.E. 2d 105.

We are of opinion, and so hold, that the amended complaint, as amended in March, 1958, states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We need not determine whether the facts alleged in paragraph 11, as amended…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Ely v. . EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Lewis v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Sharpe v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Stokes v. Southeast Hotel Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API