Pentarek v. Christy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 In this appeal, Plaintiffs Matthew G. Pentarek and Connie Pentarek, his Wife, appeal a judgment entered in favor of the defendant on May 28, 2003, under authority of Civil Rule 227.4. Defendant Gregory A. Christy cross-appeals from an order entered by the trial court on June 3, 2003, purporting to grant a new trial in favor of the Pentareks. We determine, in accordance with Rule 227.4, that the trial court’s June 3 order was a legal nullity and that *972the verdict of the jury was properly reduced to judgment on May 28, 2003. We conclude also that given the substantially…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kanter v. EpsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Angelo v. DiamontoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Elliott v. IontaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Dietrich v. DietrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Bryan v. Moxley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.