Legal Opinion
Ar-Tik System, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 9, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 24258PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EGAN, District Judge.
This action comes before the Court upon an application for intervention filed by H. A. McCullough and Hugh F. McCullough. They seek to intervene as defendants in the above captioned action pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. In conjunction with their petition to intervene the applicants have included within their pleadings a counterclaim to be asserted against the plaintiff should their plea be successful.
In order to simplify an extremely complicated set of facts, contracts and other circumstances, the Court will only present at this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Textile Workers Union of America, CIO v. The Allendale Company, Hayward-Schuster Woolen Mills, Inc. v. The Allendale CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Columbia Gas & Electric CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Ratermann v. Ratermann Realty & Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Blocker v. Board of Education of Manhasset, New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
- H. K. Ferguson Co. v. Nickel Processing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Kelley v. Pascal System, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1960