Legal Opinion
Clark v. Sandusky Appeal of De Rose
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 20, 1953No. 10846PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
Camille De Rose, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, appeals from an order of the District Court, denying her motion for leave to intervene. In the original action, filed June 19, 1951, plaintiffs, Negro citizens of the United States and of the State of Illinois, assert a right of action arising under the Constitution and the Civil Rights Statutes, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 43, 47 and 48, and invoke the jurisdiction of the federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(1), (2) and (3).
The material averments of the complaint are that, on or about June 6, 1951, plaintiffs Flarvey Clark,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Earn Line S. S. Co. v. Sutherland S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- MacDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Harry J. Stadin v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.