Legal Opinion
Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 11, 1951No. 25PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Rule 24 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in part as follows:
“(a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action: . . . (2) when the representation of the applicant’s interest by existing parties is or may be inadequate and the applicant is or may be bound by a judgment in the action; or (3) when the applicant is so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property which is in the custody or subject to the control or disposition of the court or an officer thereof.”
Appellant claims…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Continental Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
3Cited by87 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Blue Ridge Gas Company, Intervenor. Petition for Review of Order of the Federal Power Commission, No. 14583. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Appeal From United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.