Legal Opinion
H. K. Ferguson Co. v. Nickel Processing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 5, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
The H. K. Ferguson Company (“Ferguson”), a subcontractor on a United States Government project, has sued Nickel Processing Corporation of New York, the prime contractor, to recover the balance due under its subcontract. Ferguson has now moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), Féd.R.Civ.P., or, in the alternative, for an interlocutory summary judgment Fed.R. Civ.P. 56 and the direction of a reference to compute the amount of damages. Since matters outside the pleadings have been presented to the court, Ferguson’s motion shall be treated, more…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edmondson v. State Of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Union Switch & Signal, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Edmondson v. Nebraska ex rel. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Kayleigh Hayes v. 355 Restaurant Group, LLC, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Lopez v. Harrison County, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2023