Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Crewes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1939No. 27320. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. To the third amended com-

plaint, which will be referred to as the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand upon the complaint, refused to plead further, and, from the judgment dismissing the action, appealed.

The facts, as they appear in the complaint, will be stated only in so far as necessary to present the question here for determination. The respondents, Shell Oil Company and C. G. Crewes, were engaged in the sale and distribution of gasoline. The appellant, Robert O. Reeder, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Williams v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Barrett v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Arthun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gephart v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Calvin v. West Coast Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1942
  4. Pearson v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Jewett v. KerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API