Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Aluminum Co. of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1945No. 29597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

On or about April 6, 1944, eight actions were instituted against Aluminum Company of America, in the superior court for Clark county, for the purpose of recovering damages against defendant for injuries claimed to have been sustained by the several plaintiffs resulting from the negligence of the operator of a bus owned by defendant, in which plaintiffs were riding. The names of the respective plaintiffs, together with the superior court numbers of the cases, are as follows: Noah Pearson, No. 20277; Roy H. Sutton, No. 20278; Rudolph Haltiner, No. 20279; George L. Dickerson, No. 20280; Emil…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Jett v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Dunn v. TregoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aloha Lumber Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gordon v. Arden Farms Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. N. A. Degerstrom, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API