Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Kerwood

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1953No. 32492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Quaere: Can a workman injured as a result of the negligence or wrong of another not in the same employ, for which injury the workman is entitled to recover benefits under the Washington workmen’s compensation act (Laws of 1911, chapter 74, p. 345, as amended; Rem. Rev. Stat., § 7673 et seq., as amended [cf. RCW 51.04.010 et seq.]), elect to sue the person whose negligence or wrong caused the injury if that person is an employer under the act and his negligence or wrong arose out of and was connected with the extrahazardous business or employment in which he was then engaged, he having made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gephart v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Koreski v. Seattle Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. O'Brien v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. SternWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hand v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Freeman v. RinkelWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hand v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hand v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API