Arthun v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Christ Arthun, while engaged in the performance of work as a laborer for Grant Smith & Company, a contractor, in the laying of a line of pipe in and along Beacon Avenue in the city of Seattle, was struck and injured hy an automobile bus operated by the city in connection with its street car system. He sued the city, charging it with negligence, and recovered a verdict and judgment, from which the city has appealed.
The first assignment of error is that the respondent failed to make his election to sue the city in advance of suit, as required hv the workmen’s compensation act, and thereby lost…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Seligman v. . FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Rosin v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Lester v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Lester v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Hartquist v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Jolley v. United Power & Light Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Calvin v. West Coast Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1942
- Hadley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.