Legal Opinion
Costanzo v. Costanzo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 8, 1991PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
248 N.J. Super. 116 (1991)
590 A.2d 268
VINCENT COSTANZO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTOINE COSTANZO AND NORMAN ROBBINS, DEFENDANTS.
NORMAN ROBBINS, THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSEPH MONICO, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Union County Civil Action.
Decided March 8, 1991.
William A. Daniel for plaintiff.
Norman Robbins, defendant, pro se.
MENZA, J.S.C.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. The question in this case is whether an attorney has a duty to turn over funds pursuant to an assignment of funds executed by his client, where the client subsequently rejects the assignment and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Bonanza Motors, Inc. v. WebbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Brinkman v. MoskowitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
- Farmers Exchange v. Lowney Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Conopco, Inc. v. McCreadieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Great So. Nat. v. McCullough Env. Serv.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Berkowitz v. HaigoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.