Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Moskowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 24, 1962PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

It is undisputed that defendant Moskowitz had notice of the assignment to plaintiff, for medical services rendered, of a portion of the proceeds of his client’s claim for personal injuries. Consequently, in paying out moneys in disregard of such assignment, he is liable to plaintiff for the resulting damage. (Continental Purchasing Co. v. Van Raalte Co., 251 App. Div. 151.)

The affidavit submitted in support of the defendant Allstate’s motion for summary judgment fails to establish that the cause of action asserted against it has no merit.

The order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Purchasing Co. v. Van Raalte Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bonanza Motors, Inc. v. WebbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API