Legal Opinion
Conopco, Inc. v. McCreadie
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 90-2298(MTB)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff, Conopeo, Inc., has sued the partners of Ernst & Young (“E & Y”) 1 alleging breach of contract, professional negligence and malpractice, and breach of the implied warranty of fitness for use under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) in connec tion with a computer management consulting agreement between Faberge, Inc. (“Faberge”) and E & Y, which agreement was subsequently assigned by Faberge to Conopco’s parent, Unilever United States, Inc. (“Unilever”). E & Y now moves for summary judgment on all three counts of the complaint. For the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Rotech Healthcare Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Docteroff v. Barra Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Higgins v. LauritzenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.