Legal Opinion

Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 16, 1951PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hehbk, J.

The essential question here is whether the respondent American Type Founders, Inc., is under a duty to-satisfy plaintiffs’ judgment by default in attachment, in these circumstances: •

On March 15, 1946, a writ of attachment issued out of the former Supreme Court under R. 8. 2:42—1, et seq., at the suit of the plaintiffs against the defendant Fred G. Pohl Company, to recover a debt of $5,938.90, with interest from October 2, 1945, ultimately established by a judgment in that sum, with interest amounting to $1,230.38, or a total of $7,169.28,'…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Black v. J. W. Zacharie & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Vanbuskirk v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1841
  5. McDowell, Pyle & Co. v. HopfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Berkowitz v. HaigoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Costanzo v. CostanzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. New Century Financial Services Inc. v. OughlaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. Tirgan v. Mega Life & Health InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Marsellis-Warner Corp. v. RabensDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API