Legal Opinion
Sanford v. Clinton Public Schools
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 20, 1999No. AC 18240PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiff, Dean Sanford, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the workers’ compensation commissioner’s (commissioner) dismissal of the plaintiffs claim for workers’ compensation benefits on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly (1) ruled that his claim for mental illness, which did not arise from a physical injury or occupational disease, was precluded by General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 31-275 (16), as amended by No. 93-228, § 1, of the 1993 Public…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Toro v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Sanford v. Clinton Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999