Legal Opinion

Wutzke v. Hoberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2004No. 20030300PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jerry L. Wutzke appealed from a district court judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We affirm, holding Wutzke had a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wutzke’s petition.

I

[¶ 2] Wutzke was employed as a deputy sheriff with the Burleigh County Sheriffs Department until June 5, 2003 when he was terminated by the sheriff. Wutzke appealed his termination and requested an administrative hearing. Allen Hoberg, the Director of the Office of Administrative Hearings,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KoppyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Frank v. TraynorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Krabseth v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gottbreht v. State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Eichhorn v. The Waldo Township Bd. of SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kalvoda v. Bismarck Public School District 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Edinger v. Governing Authority of the Stutsman County Correctional Center & Law Enforcement CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lamb v. State Board of Law ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API