Legal Opinion

Lamb v. State Board of Law Examiners

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2010No. 20090131PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Timothy C. Lamb appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion to reconsider and his application for a writ of mandamus to require the State Board of Law Examiners to provide information about the February 2008 bar examination procedures. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion because Lamb does not have a clear legal right to the requested information.

I

[¶ 2] Based on the results of Lamb’s February 2008 bar examination, the State Board of Bar Examiners recommended Lamb not be admitted to the Bar of North Dakota. Lamb requested a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Dodrill v. Arkansas Democrat Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. City of Bismarck v. UhdenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Application of PetersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bester v. SUPREME COURT COM. ON BAR ADM.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Grand Forks Homes, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Dahl v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hagen v. North Dakota Insurance Reserve FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API