Legal Opinion

Frank v. Traynor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1999No. 990013PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Deborah Frank appealed from a judgment dismissing her petition for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the Workers Compensation Bureau to hold a formal hearing on her claim for benefits. Because Frank had a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law through a direct appeal from the Bureau’s determination that her request for reconsideration was insufficient, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the writ of mandamus. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Frank filed a workers compensation claim on August 25, 1997, alleging she…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Medcenter One, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lende v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wilson v. KoppyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Carlson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wutzke v. HobergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kalvoda v. Bismarck Public School District 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API