Legal Opinion

Eichhorn v. The Waldo Township Bd. of Supervisors

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2006No. 20050295PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ervin Eichhorn appealed from a district court order permitting the Rich-land County Water Resource District (“District”) to intervene in his action against Waldo Township (“Township”) and from a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Township to install a larger culvert under a township road. We hold the district court did not err in permitting the District to intervene and did not abuse its discretion in denying Eichhorn’s request for a writ of mandamus. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Eichhorn owns Richland County land described as the northeast…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Little v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Huber v. Oliver CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Effertz v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Olson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Brigham Oil & Gas, L.P. v. Lario Oil & Gas Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. White v. T.P. Motel, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Skogen v. Hemen Township Board of Township SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Berg v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API