Mahoney v. Norcross
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The case at bar falls within the general principle that in an action arising from a collision between automobiles at intersecting streets the due care and contributory negligence of the plaintiff and the negligence, of the defendant present questions of fact. The finding in favor of the plaintiff imports a finding of all subsidiary facts essential to that conclusion and must stand unless unsupported by the evidence. Without summarizing the testimony it is enough to say that a finding in favor of the plaintiff was warranted. Ferreira v. Zaccolanti, 281 Mass. 91.
The defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Ferreira v. ZaccolantiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
3Cited by51 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Dolham v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- MacDonald v. AdamianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Gibbons v. DenoncourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.