Legal Opinion

Padilla v. Bydalek

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1976No. 580 (1974)Published

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The only question presented on this appeal from a judgment of nonsuit is whether the evidence presented by plaintiff created a jury question.1 That was the question before the trial court on defendant’s motion for nonsuit, and is the question before this court now.2 Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, if there is any inference which might reasonably be drawn therefrom which supports *49the plaintiff’s claim, the motion for nonsuit should have been denied by the trial court and cannot be affirmed by this court.3 This requires a review of the evidence adduced by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Household Utilities, Inc. v. Andrews Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Village of Brown Deer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Padilla v. BydalekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API