Legal Opinion

Household Utilities, Inc. v. Andrews Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1976No. 144 (1974)PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Both parties state the issue on this appeal to be whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for nonsuit. The test that has been applied by this court in such cases is the same as that to be employed by the trial court in ruling on the motion in the first instance. That is — the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff; and if there is any inference which might reasonably be drawn therefrom which supports the plaintiff’s claim, the motion for nonsuit should be denied. In this state, involuntary nonsuit is a common-law motion equivalent to a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Witt v. Realist, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Milbauer v. Transport Employes' Mutual Benefit SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kaminsky v. Milwaukee Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Skycom Corporation and Gerald M. Walters v. Telstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kernz v. J. L. French Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  5. Christianson v. DownsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API