Vaszauskas v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in concluding that an invalid condition could be severed from the approval of an application for a zoning variance, thus upholding the granting of the variance. The plaintiff, Randy Vaszauskas, appealed from a decision rendered by the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Southbury (board),1 granting him a variance from the application of two relevant zoning regulations, subject to the fulfillment of several conditions. The trial court determined that one of the conditions was invalid, since it was incapable of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Blaker v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Beckish v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Parish of St. Andrew's Protestant Episcopal Church v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Lurie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Branhaven Plaza, LLC v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Colangelo v. HeckelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Clifford v. PLAN. AND ZON. COM'N OF ANSONIASupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.