Legal Opinion
Beckish v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 23, 1971PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiffs applied to the defendant commission for a special, permit pursuant to § 4.32 (D) of the zoning regulations of the town of Columbia to extend an existing nonconforming use to include the remaining unoccupied floor space in the building, known as the Landmark, owned by Prances Beekish. and operated by the plaintiffs as the owners of Landmark, Inc., which is located at the intersection of routes 6A and 87. At a meeting of the commission held on November 14, 1967, it was voted to grant a special permit as requested subject to eighteen conditions and the plaintiffs’ appeal is based…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Liggett's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- A.P. & W. Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Daughters of St. Paul, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.