Legal Opinion

Steadman v. Halland

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1982No. 81-402PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Petitioners, Steadman and Boehm, appeal from a denial of their petition for writ of mandamus in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, wherein the District Court upheld respondent Halland in rejecting petitioners’ recall petition. We affirm the District Court.

The following issues are presented to this Court for review:(1) Did the District Court err in denying petitioners’ petition for writ of mandamus?

SUB-ISSUES:

A. Did the recall petition alleging official misconduct meet statutory requirements as to form?

B. Did the respondent properly reject the recall petition on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kostbade v. MetierMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bocek v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Johnstone v. SanbornMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Spaeth v. EmmettMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re the Estate of JensenMontana Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jerome v. PardisMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Shimsky v. Valley Credit UnionMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Larson v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. Division of Motor VehiclesMontana Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API