Legal Opinion

Jerome v. Pardis

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1989No. 89-323PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This appeal involves the imposition of sanctions under Rule 37, M.R.Civ.P. for abuses of discovery. Plaintiff Ardis Jerome appeals the order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, granting defendants’, William H. Pardis and Pardis Chiropractic Clinics, P.C., motion to dismiss Jerome’s cause of action with prejudice. We affirm.

Appellant Jerome raises a sole issue on appeal: Did the District Court abuse its discretion by dismissing Jerome’s lawsuit on the grounds that she violated Rule 37, M.R.Civ.P.?

Jerome’s complaint alleges that during treatment in early June of 1984, Dr.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. G-K Properties v. Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Owen v. F. A. Buttrey Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. First Bank (NA)-Billings v. HeidemaMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Shimsky v. Valley Credit UnionMontana Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Richardson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. District No. 55 v. Musselshell CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mont. State Univ.-Bozeman v. Mont. First Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API