Legal Opinion

Shimsky v. Valley Credit Union

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1984No. 83-223PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

This case involves allegations of violations of the Truth in Lending Act and breach of contract in relation to an “open ended” financing arrangement. This appeal is taken from the District Court order dismissing appellants’ complaint and granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment.

On January 10, 1979, appellant Patrick F. Shimsky obtained a $5,500 loan from respondent (hereinafter Credit Union) by means of an open ended revolving credit plan. The annual percentage rate on the outstanding balance was 12%, and the agreement provided for minimum monthly payments. The language which gave…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harland v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Reaves v. ReinboldMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rumph v. Dale Edwards, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Montgomery v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Kostbade v. MetierMontana Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGLMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jerome v. PardisMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. District No. 55 v. Musselshell CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Koppen v. Board of Medical ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gamble Robinson Co. v. Carousel PropertiesMontana Supreme Court · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API