Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Division of Motor Vehicles

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. 85-297PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

The State appeals a Ravalli County District Court order requiring the State to restore a driver’s license seized under Montana’s Implied Consent Law when the driver failed to submit to a breathalyzer test requested by a police officer. The issue on appeal is whether respondent James Johnson “cured” his failure to submit to the breathalyzer test by initiating a blood alcohol test a short time later. We hold that the later test did not cure respondent’s prior failure to submit and, accordingly, we reverse.

The only evidence in the District Court file is the result of the blood alcohol test…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. Moore v. STATE, MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Rust v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Northern Border Pipeline Co. v. State, Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hunter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API