Legal Opinion

People v. Foster

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1933No. Calendar 35,789PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Defendants review denial of their motions to dismiss the prosecution for failure to accord them a speedy trial, in violation of the Constitution, Art. 2, § 19:

“In every criminal prosecution, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury. ’ ’

Defendants were charged with criminal syndicalism in one information, but demanded separate trials. The last arraignment was on December 5, 1922. William Z. Foster was tried and the jury disagreed in April, 1923. Charles E. Ruthenberg, a codefendant, was tried in May, 1923, and found guilty. The conviction was affirmed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Butts v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Meadowcroft v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State v. SlorahSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. GrimmettMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. KrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. SchramMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API