Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2006No. 200,153-0PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Attorney Jeffrey T. Haley appeals the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association (Board) that he serve two six-month suspensions pursuant to counts 2 and 3 of his disciplinary proceedings. Regarding count 2, the Board determined that Haley was subject to a six-month suspension for knowingly violating RPC 4.2(a), which provides that, “[i]n representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate . . . with a party . . . represented by another lawyer.” The Board concluded as to count 3 that Haley was subject to a six-month suspension for knowingly…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HolcombWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against BurtchWashington Supreme Court · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API