State ex rel. Engelhard v. Weber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Stearns county, Searle, J., striking out as sham and frivolous the answer of defendant to the information of relator, and directing a judgment of ouster.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Proceedings in the nature of quo warranto to determine the right to the office of county commissioner of Stearns county. It appears from the record that relator was elected to the office of county commissioner of the Third district of Stearns county at the general election of 1900, and duly qualified and entered upon and continued in the discharge of the duties thereof during the following term of four years. Defendant was elected to the office at the general election of 1904, and on January 1, 1905, duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. Thereafter, on the theory that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Minor v. HappersettSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Van Berkel v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Rhea v. HackneySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State ex rel. Nordin v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State ex rel. Smallwood v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Sheets v. RamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.