Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Sakelaris

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1957No. Crim. 5837PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem. *

Defendant in this case was found guilty by a jury of one count of bookmaking, and of a second count of keeping a place with bookmaking paraphernalia. (Pen. Code, § 337a.) He was found not guilty of two other counts; recording a bet, and making a wager. He was sentenced to one year in the county jail.

He urges four grounds of appeal from the judgment:

1. Insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdicts of guilty.

2. Refusal to give instructions requested by him.

3. Comments by the trial judge that he claims prejudiced him with the jury.

4. That exhibits admitted in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. JaurequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. AmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. KobeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Ames v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. HiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. BuckmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API