Legal Opinion
People v. Buckman
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1960No. Crim. 7109PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Appellants Drugan, Chernoek and LaCroix, with codefendants Reynolds and Buckman, were variously charged in four counts alleging conspiracy to commit, and violations of, the bookmaking statute. Count I charged all defendants except LaCroix with conspiracy to violate section 337a, subdivisions 1, 2 and 4, Penal Code, alleging four overt acts—occupancy of premises at—915 North Sycamore Avenue by Reynolds (No. 1), 5407 Sierra Vista Street by Buckman (No. 2), 7465 Hawthorne Avenue by Chernoek (No. 3), and 3200 West Beverly Boulevard by Drugan (No. 4), with bookmaking paraphernalia for the purpose…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. CooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Beauregard v. WingardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
- People v. BazaureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. UlibarriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.