Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Humphries

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1954No. 35167PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. By virtue of the provisions of the Smith-Lever Act of 1914 (7 U. S. C. A. § 341 et seq.) the position of Cooperative Agricultural Extension Agent came into being. By the terms of that act certain Federal funds were appropriated by the Congress of the United States for cooperative agricultural extension work in the various States and Territories of the United States. These funds were made available to those States and Territories which assented to the act and appropriated a like sum for such work. The State of Georgia assented to the act in the same year (Ga. L. 1914, p. 1243), and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. BF Goodrich Company v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. City of Brunswick v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Georgia Department of Human Resources v. DemoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. SPRINGFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Lewis v. DeKalb CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API