Legal Opinion
City of Brunswick v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 12, 1953No. 34523PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
A city may operate an amusement park for profit, and it retains a measure of control over the premises when the operation of the park is vested in a committee composed partly of members of the city council. Davis v. City of Atlanta, 84 Ga. App. 572 (66 S. E. 2d, 188). From this it follows that a city which operates a recreation field for profit, under an ordinance placing sole control of such field in a board appointed by the city commission, retains sole control over the operation of such premises by and through such board as its agent and creature. The test as to who is the manager or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. MiddlebrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Davis v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Small v. NuGrape Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Gigax v. Ralston Purina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Seckinger & Co. v. ForemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Georgia Department of Human Resources v. DemoryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- State Department of Revenue v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.