Legal Opinion
B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 22, 1953No. 34577PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. “The Workmen’s Compensation Act makes the finding of the board upon the facts final and conclusive, and in the absence of fraud such finding cannot be set aside by any court, if there is any competent evidence to support it. Code, § 114-710; Georgia Casualty Co. v. Martin, 157 Ga. 909 (122 S. E. 881); Maryland Casualty Co. v. England, 160 Ga. 810 (129 S. E. 75); Bituminous Casualty Co. v. Jackson, 68 Ga. App. 447 (23 S. E. 2d, 191).” Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hopkins, 71 Ga. App. 175 (30 S. E. 2d, 357).
2. “The weight and credit to be given to the testimony of the witnesses and also the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Southern Railway Co. v. TankersleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Continental Casualty Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fox v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- BF Goodrich Company v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Riegel Textile Corp. v. VinyardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Dill v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.