Legal Opinion

Valenti v. Planning Zon. Comm'n, Stonington, No. 097768 (Sep. 3, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 3, 1992No. 097768Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 8358 This case comes before the court as an appeal from a denial of a subdivision application.

The plaintiffs are owners of the property and "are' aggrieved.

If a subdivision plan meets and complies with the Planning Commission Subdivision Regulations the commissioner has no discretion but to approve the plan Westport v. Norwalk167 Conn. 151 (1974).

After public hearing, the commissioner denied the application. The reasons stated for denial were:

1. Violates S.D. Reg. V1-2E-No50 Row…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API