Legal Opinion
United States v. Huntington National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 14, 2012No. 10-2071PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Huntington National Bank (“Huntington”) claims that it is entitled to the proceeds of a deposit account, which were seized by the government as part of a criminal forfeiture proceeding, as a secured creditor of the account. Huntington asserts that it qualifies as a bona fide purchaser for value under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6)(B) and appeals the district court’s ruling that, as a matter of law, it did not. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the district court and direct the district court to amend the order of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stowers v. MahonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,908 Alexander MacDonald (95-6028/6286) v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (95-6030/6287)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Charles EmorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. Real Property, Including All Improvements Thereon & Appurtenances TheretoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- United States v. Peña-FernándezUnited States District Court · 2019
- United States v. SigillitoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.