Legal Opinion
United States v. Peña-Fernández
United States District Court
Decided May 10, 2019No. Criminal No. 18-426 (FAB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BESOSA, District Judge.
On October 12, 2018, the Court issued a preliminary forfeiture order pursuant to 21 U.S.C. section 853(n) (" section 853") and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2 (" Rule 32.2"). (Docket No. 24.) Third-party petitioners Doctor's Associates, LLC ("Doctor's Associates") and Subway Realty, LLC ("Subway Realty") (collectively "Subway") move for relief from forfeiture. (Docket No. 34.) For the reasons set forth below, Subway's motion for relief from forfeiture is DENIED .
I. Background
On July 3, 2018, a grand jury charged defendant Felix Peña-Hernández ("Peña") with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael J. KingsleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. CatalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE- LEAD CASE IS NOW CIVIL NO. 19-cv-2138 SCC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
- Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors v. BlockFi Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Doctor's Associates, LLC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021