Legal Opinion
Guy v. Utecht
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1944No. 12864PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The question for decision is whether the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota erred in denying and dismissing, without a hearing, appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
The factual situation out of which this controversy arises is stated in detail in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Minnesota in the case of Guy v. Utecht, 216 Minn. 255, 12 N.W.2d 753, and is briefly, but adequately, stated in the opinion of the United States District Court in 54 F.Supp. 287.
The appellant (who will be referred to as “petitioner”) is confined in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. HensleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Willis v. UtechtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Helms v. HumphreyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
- Ex parte DarrDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.