Legal Opinion

Willis v. Utecht

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1951No. 14151_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEWEY, District Judge.

The above named appellants, jointly, and on March 6, 1950, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the fourth division of the district court of the United States for the district of Minnesota.

This application recites that they are deprived of their liberties by the warden of the Minnesota state prison, at Stillwater, Minnesota, because of a judgment of conviction and sentence by the district court of Anoka County, Minnesota, and that judgment is void as it was obtained by violations of the applicants constitutional rights.

The application further states that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. State Ex Rel. Baker v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. Dufault v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Jesse Embree v. George A. Cummings, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Nichols v. McGeeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  3. Delaney v. ShobeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
  4. Meek v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. J. A. H. Barkeij v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API