Salinger v. Loisel
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter
These three cases involve certain phases of a protracted resistance by B. I. Salinger, Jr., to an effort by the United States to have him removed to the District of South Dakota to answer an indictment for a violation there of § 215 of the Criminal Code, which makes it-a punishable offense to use the mail for the purpose of executing a scheme or artifice to defraud.
The indictment was returned in the District Court for the District of South Dakota when sitting in the western division, and the offense was charged as committed in the southern division; but the grand jury which returned the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by377 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
372 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.